Broadband for all: 8 next steps for Seattle
The City of Seattle will not build a
municipal fiber broadband network, which would create access to
high-speed Internet for all of the city’s residents. That’s the real
message behind the city’s recently released $180,000 consultant study on the feasibility of such a network in the Emerald City.
Seattle City Council Member Kshama Sawant immediately condemned
this conclusion. It’s a surprising position – a Socialist council
member arguing for investment in ostensibly capitalistic “stuff” like
fiber cable, electronics and so forth, rather than in programs which
directly and immediately benefit people. That said, she lays out an
articulate case for such a network’s public good.
According to the city’s study, Seattle would
have to invest $460 million to $660 million in building this network.
Seattle would need to get 43 percent of potential customers choosing the
service at $75 a month in order to break even. Such a “take rate” is
virtually impossible due to the serious competition already in place
from Comcast, Wave, CenturyLink, Verizon, AT&T and other services.
CenturyLink is already building Gigabit fiber broadband, and will likely serve 100,000 Seattle premises by the end of the year. Wave Broadband just obtained $130 million in funding to expand its fiber network. Comcast is expecting to offer “multi-gigabit broadband” to a million Washington customers this summer.
The city, starting from scratch, cannot hope to compete.
Very few other United States cities have
built their own broadband networks, and only a tiny handful have been
successful. The list of successes: perhaps Chattanooga and Cedar Falls,
Iowa. The list of failures: Burlington (Vermont), Provo, Clarksville
(Tennessee), UTOPIA (suburban Salt Lake City), Tacoma and more.
As they have in every city that has
considered such a network, we can expect cable company incumbents to
oppose a Seattle municipal network with lawsuits, which will be argued
up to and including the Washington Supreme Court. We can also expect
them to argue against government competition in the court of public
opinion through ads and outreach. And we can expect them to cut their
prices to financially starve a City-owned network – good for ratepayers
but a very bad for broadband network finances.
Must Seattle settle for a high-cost Internet
duopoly of Comcast and CenturyLink, with Wave Broadband nibbling around
the edges? What’s our high-tech, arguably world-class, Tech City to do?
First Seattle needs to clearly understand
its goals in considering a municipal broadband network. Then we need to
decide whether we must really invest a half-billion dollars and years of
lawsuits to achieve those goals.
As Seattle’s Chief Technology Officer
between 2003 and 2012 – a time in which municipal broadband options were
examined closely in the city – I’ve had a lot of time to consider this
issue. As such, here are eight recommendations for potential next steps:
1) Declare Internet access a basic human right for Seattle’s residents. A worldwide movement
already supports such action, arguing the Internet is essential to
education, democracy, economic opportunity, disaster relief and
healthcare. Today, many of the human rights
in the United States Constitution or identified by the United Nation
are intimately connected to Internet access. Such a declaration would
help focus Seattle city government’s efforts toward improving Internet
access.
2) Create a Seattle Technology Opportunity Fund.
This latest broadband study identifies some potential funding sources,
including a property tax. Seattle residents have willingly taxed
themselves to support bus service expansion, a new Seattle Public
Library, rebuilding or building new fire stations and libraries in every
neighborhood, a family and education levy, housing levies and more over
the last two decades. A tax increase for universal preschool,
benefiting just those families with young children, passed in 2014, and
Mayor Murray has proposed a transportation levy totalling almost one
billion dollars. Many funding sources are possible for the suggestions
below, including a redirection of existing cable franchise fees,
a new property tax levy or a sales tax increase. Such funding sources
might be collectively called the “Seattle Technology Opportunity Fund.”
3) Subsidize Internet access for low-income residents and small business.
This is the most straightforward recommendation. Seattle already
supports low-income rates for electricity, water and sewer and other
City services. Comcast, Wave and CenturyLink have special rates for
low income subscribers. The City could use its own funding and work
with existing providers to develop what amounts to “zero cost” Internet
access for low-income residents and certain small businesses. This
approach engages the existing providers to support Seattle’s goals
almost immediately, rather than engaging them in a years-long court
battle over municipal broadband.
4) Provide free or low cost devices for students and low-income residents.
Of course Internet access is useless unless you have a computer and the
know-how to use it. Seattle already has a world-class community technology program.
With additional funding, the city could work with private sector
computer recyclers, repair shops and community organizations to
refurbish computers, smart phones, tablet computers and other devices,
then distribute them to students and low-income residents.
5) Upgrade networks in Seattle’s public schools. Access to Internet-based education such as Khan Academy
is proven to help students learn. A simple conversation with any
teacher will quickly reveal a lack of high speed networking, computing
devices and tech support in Seattle Public Schools. This lack is not due
to lack of will, but simply lack of funding and staffing. Rather than
invest hundreds of millions in a city municipal network, investing a
few tens of millions in technical support and devices for the Seattle
public schools could achieve phenomenal results. This recommendation
will complement the goals and projects currently underway with the Seattle Family and Education Levy, multiplying the effects of that investment.
6) Invest in computer labs, free wi-fi and maker-spaces.
The City of Seattle already provides some computer labs in libraries
and Parks Community Centers, and free wi-fi is available in community
centers and all libraries. A few maker-spaces with 3D printers and
electronic tooling equipment are available. Every one of these programs
could be expanded to more locations with the Technology Opportunity
Fund. More maker-spaces, with cheap hardware components such as Raspberry Pi,
could allow students and other residents to develop their skills with
hardware as well as software. Wi-fi and computing devices could also
be made available in homeless shelters.
7) Community academies and workforce training.
Seattle is a world-class technology center, but its private companies
badly need more staff with advanced computer skills. With the Seattle
Technology Opportunity Fund, the city could establish a whole series of
programs to fulfill these needs. Working with the Seattle Colleges
(formerly Seattle Community Colleges), Seattle Public Schools and
locally-based Gates Foundation and org,
the City could leverage its Families and Education levy plus the
Seattle Technology Opportunity Fund to build a whole series of training
opportunities. These might include coding education for Seattle
residents and students and, indeed, an “hour of code”
in every school and business in Seattle. Promising students from
these programs could be placed in internships with local technology
services companies. Such individuals could move on to high-wage tech
jobs, and since many of the students would be women and people of color,
this program will also address the huge disparities in the workforce
for those groups.
8) Licensing popular content.
Many people complain that they are forced to buy cable TV packages with
hundreds of channels they never use. Wil Saunders of the State of
Washington’s Broadband Office suggests the City approach popular content
providers such as Disney
and ESPN to directly license access to their content. Seattle residents
would access this content over their Internet connections in lieu of
buying cable TV. This places the City at odds with the cable
companies, but for the most part they already see the end is near for
traditional cable television service. In fact, most local TV channels
are already available over the Internet with IPTV Seattle service, based in Olympia.
Innovation and competition are not strengths of city government. While governments can help develop many of the underlying technologies,
they cannot build an iPhone, a Netflix, or a Surface tablet computer.
On the other hand, government is good at forging partnerships,
collaborating and bringing diverse public and private interest groups
together to solve problems. Mayor Murray has demonstrated that with his Digital Equity Action Committee.
Rather than incite costly legal battles, the
Seattle Technology Opportunity Fund capitalizes on such public-private
collaboration to provide new opportunities for all of Seattle students
and residents, at a fraction of the cost of an expensive municipal
broadband network. Given the lack of current forward movement on this
issue, why not give it a try?
Source > crosscut
No comments:
Post a Comment