Experimental treatments raise cautious hope in Alzheimer's fight
The complexities of Alzheimer's disease make it difficult to treat, but three drugs under trial are showing promise. |
Pharmaceutical researchers on Wednesday presented new data from the
clinical trials of three drugs that, the scientists said, show promise
for slowing the progression of Alzheimer's disease.
Researchers
presented new analyses of research data on drugs produced by Eli Lilly,
Roche and Biogen. All of the drugs involve using monoclonal antibodies,
which are genetically engineered to mimic actions carried out by the
body's immune system, and all of them target the accumulation in the
brain of an abnormal protein known as beta amyloid, which forms
insoluble plaques that can trigger the destruction of surrounding brain
cells.
But in a field in which almost every drug has failed to do
what its backers initially hoped, several scientists also cautioned
against putting too much emphasis on data that showed incremental
progress.
The results – presented at the Alzheimer's Association
International Conference, held in Washington – offered a glimpse into an
expensive and frustrating hunt for medications to tackle a costly and
terrifying disease. More than 5 million people in the United States have
Alzheimer's, and the number is expected to reach 13.5 million by
mid-century. By 2040, when baby boomers will range from 76 to 94 years
old, the disease will cost more than $328 million (NZ $495 million).
According
to the Southern Cross Medical Library, it's estimated that 28,000 New
Zealanders are living with Alzheimer's disease and that number will
reach 70,000 by 2031.
David Knopman, a physician and vice chairman
of the Alzheimer's Association medical and scientific advisory council,
took care to tamp down expectations among patients and their families
anxious for a cure.
SOLID ADVANCES BUT NO PROMISES
"To
be honest, these results are not going to be something they can get
next week," Knopman said. "But what you're hearing here represents solid
advances, both in technology, in conceptualisation and – at a practical
level, as two of the studies talk about – in figuring out what's the
right dose."
Eli Lilly's researchers said their analysis of the
drug solanezumab showed the potential value of a "delayed start"
approach to clinical trials as a way of determining a drug's success in
slowing the progression of a degenerative brain disease. And the study
lent additional support to the view that identifying signs of
Alzheimer's early and beginning early treatment could make a significant
difference for people who suffer from dementia.
Previous studies
have been ineffective at treating Alzheimer's disease. But amid signs
that solanezumab could help people in the stages leading up to the
disease, the researchers continued to follow a group of participants who
had only mild cognitive impairment. The participants – including those
who had been on a placebo – continued to receive the drug for an
additional two years in what amounted to a delayed-start experiment.
In a delayed-start trial, patients are assigned at random either to
receive the drug or a placebo at the beginning of the study. After a
period, however, those who initially received the placebo begin taking
the experimental drug. If the drug reduces symptoms only, and the
maximum reduction of symptoms is achieved in two months, the later group
should catch up to the earlier group and be functioning at a similar
level. But if the drug slows the disease's progression, both groups
should benefit, but members of the later group will never catch up
because the disease will have progressed while they were receiving the
placebo.
In the Eli Lilly analysis, the researchers said the
results showed that the treatment differences between the early-start
and delayed-start groups did not vanish, and that the later group did
not catch up with the others – leading scientists also to conclude that
there is a potential benefit to starting the drug as early as possible.
Paul
Aisen, a physician who heads the Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research
Institute at the University of Southern California at San Diego, said
the solanezumab study showed that in people with mild cognitive
impairment, the rate of degeneration slowed by about one-third.
Biogen's
drug, aducanumab, which is in development and designed to flush beta
amyloid deposits from brains in the early stages of degeneration, has
already produced results that appear promising, researchers said. On
Wednesday, scientists offered new data suggesting that they had also
homed in on a dose for the drug that struck a balance between beneficial
effects and negative side-effects such as inflammation.
Similarly,
a clinical trial on Roche's drug, gantenerumab, was halted in December
amid signs that it was not going to reach targets for efficacy: Patients
who received the drug failed overall to improve on measures of
cognitive performance, compared with those who received a placebo. But
upon resifting the data, researchers found there was evidence that the
patients whose disease was progressing more rapidly might benefit from a
higher dose of gantenerumab.
Philip Scheltens, a professor of
cognitive neurology and director of the Alzheimer's Centre at the VU
University Medical Centre in Amsterdam, said the results suggest that
the dose of gantenerumab used so far was too low and that the drug
should be tested further at higher doses.
STILL UNRAVELLING ALZHEIMER'S
Ronald
Petersen, director of the Mayo Clinic's Alzheimer's Disease Research
Centre, said he was cautiously optimistic about the results for the
three drugs.
But he said it is becoming clearer that Alzheimer's
resembles a syndrome more than a disease, with multiple pathways and
pathologies and therefore no single target to focus on for a possible
cure. The likelihood is that several medications will have to be used
together for effective treatments, he said.
"It's not like there's
nothing out there; it's not like there's nowhere to go," said Petersen,
who also chairs the national Advisory Council on Alzheimer's Research,
Care and Services. "Clinical trials using antibodies to remove amyloid
from the brain are making progress... The thinking is positive; the
theme is positive. But the data aren't there yet to say the drugs are
effective."
Source : stuff
We Are Fossasia Stay Connected With Us On Twitter . . . ! ! !
No comments:
Post a Comment